Side by side
Simplex BFT vs Tempo Zones
Simplex BFT and Tempo Zones both operate in the Protocol & Core part of the Tempo ecosystem. Simplex BFT — Tempo's Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus, implemented by Commonware.. Tempo Zones — Private execution environments connected to Tempo Mainnet..
Simplex BFTmainnet
Tempo's Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus, implemented by Commonware.
- Implemented by
- Commonware
- Block time
- ~600ms, VRF leader election, deterministic finality
- Liveness
- Halts if >1/3 validators unavailable (safety over liveness)
Tempo Zonesbeta
Private execution environments connected to Tempo Mainnet.
- Visibility
- Operator sees all in-zone tx; public sees proofs + limited metadata
- Status
- Phased rollout with design partners
The record
How they compare
| Field | Simplex BFT | Tempo Zones |
|---|---|---|
| Type | protocol component | protocol component |
| Category | Protocol & Core | Protocol & Core |
| Status | mainnet | beta |
| Chains | Tempo | Tempo |
| Website | — | — |
| Docs | — | Yes |
| GitHub | — | — |
| Confidence | 85% | 75% |
| Sources | 1 | 1 |
Read on
Answers
Simplex BFT vs Tempo Zones: questions
- What is the difference between Simplex BFT and Tempo Zones on Tempo?
- Simplex BFT is Tempo's Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus, implemented by Commonware.. Tempo Zones is Private execution environments connected to Tempo Mainnet.. Both sit in the Protocol & Core part of the Tempo ecosystem.
- Is Simplex BFT or Tempo Zones live on Tempo?
- Simplex BFT is live on Tempo mainnet; Tempo Zones is currently beta.
- Should I choose Simplex BFT or Tempo Zones?
- It depends on your use case — both serve the Protocol & Core role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Simplex BFT: 85%, Tempo Zones: 75%), then read each full profile before deciding.