Vol. 1 · 7 Jun 2026
Side by side

MetaMask vs Zerion

MetaMask and Zerion both operate in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem. MetaMaskThe most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.. Zerion Wallet and portfolio app with its own data API..

MetaMask logo
MetaMaskactive

The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.

Developer
Developed by and part of Consensys.
Tempo connection details
Tempo Mainnet uses chain ID 4217, RPC https://rpc.tempo.xyz, and USD as the currency symbol.
Fees on Tempo
Tempo has no native gas token; transaction fees in MetaMask are paid in USD-denominated stablecoins such as pathUSD.
Zerion logo
Zerionactive

Wallet and portfolio app with its own data API.

Ecosystem Role
Zerion is an infrastructure partner providing wallet interfaces and developer data APIs, focusing on portfolio tracking and transaction history.
Mainnet Support
Zerion provides active production support for the Tempo mainnet across both its consumer wallet and Developer API.
API Features
The Developer API supports indexing for token positions, portfolio balances, and provides transaction webhooks.
MPP Integration
Zerion integrates with Tempo's Machine Payment Protocol (MPP) to facilitate agentic, pay-per-call data access.

The record

How they compare

FieldMetaMaskZerion
Typeinfrastructureinfrastructure
CategoryWallets & CustodyWallets & Custody
Statusactiveactive
Chains
WebsiteYesYes
Docs
GitHub
Confidence97%79%
Sources34

Read on


Answers

MetaMask vs Zerion: questions

What is the difference between MetaMask and Zerion on Tempo?
MetaMask is The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.. Zerion is Wallet and portfolio app with its own data API.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.
Is MetaMask or Zerion live on Tempo?
Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — MetaMask is active and Zerion is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
Should I choose MetaMask or Zerion?
It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (MetaMask: 97%, Zerion: 79%), then read each full profile before deciding.