Vol. 1 · 7 Jun 2026
Side by side

MetaMask vs Privy

MetaMask and Privy both operate in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem. MetaMaskThe most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.. Privy Embedded wallets and onboarding; acquired by Stripe..

MetaMask logo
MetaMaskactive

The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.

Developer
Developed by and part of Consensys.
Tempo connection details
Tempo Mainnet uses chain ID 4217, RPC https://rpc.tempo.xyz, and USD as the currency symbol.
Fees on Tempo
Tempo has no native gas token; transaction fees in MetaMask are paid in USD-denominated stablecoins such as pathUSD.
Privy logo
Privyactive

Embedded wallets and onboarding; acquired by Stripe.

Category
Embedded-wallet and user-onboarding infrastructure that lets developers add wallets to their applications.
Custody model
Wallets are embedded and self-custodial, letting users transact without managing seed phrases.
Tempo support
Lists Tempo among the EVM-compatible chains it supports for embedded wallets.
Stripe acquisition
Announced on June 11, 2025 that Stripe is acquiring Privy.

The record

How they compare

FieldMetaMaskPrivy
Typeinfrastructureinfrastructure
CategoryWallets & CustodyWallets & Custody
Statusactiveactive
Chains
WebsiteYesYes
Docs
GitHub
Confidence97%84%
Sources36

Read on


Answers

MetaMask vs Privy: questions

What is the difference between MetaMask and Privy on Tempo?
MetaMask is The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.. Privy is Embedded wallets and onboarding; acquired by Stripe.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.
Is MetaMask or Privy live on Tempo?
Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — MetaMask is active and Privy is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
Should I choose MetaMask or Privy?
It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (MetaMask: 97%, Privy: 84%), then read each full profile before deciding.