What is the difference between MetaMask and Para on Tempo?

MetaMask is The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.. Para is Embedded MPC wallets across apps.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.

Is MetaMask or Para live on Tempo?

Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — MetaMask is active and Para is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.

Should I choose MetaMask or Para?

It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (MetaMask: 97%, Para: 80%), then read each full profile before deciding.

Side by side

MetaMask vs Para

MetaMask and Para both operate in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem. MetaMask — The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.. Para — Embedded MPC wallets across apps..

MetaMaskactive

The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.

Developer: Developed by and part of Consensys.
Tempo connection details: Tempo Mainnet uses chain ID 4217, RPC https://rpc.tempo.xyz, and USD as the currency symbol.
Fees on Tempo: Tempo has no native gas token; transaction fees in MetaMask are paid in USD-denominated stablecoins such as pathUSD.

Paraactive

Embedded MPC wallets across apps.

Category: Embedded (in-app), non-custodial wallet infrastructure — a wallet-as-a-service developer platform built on multi-party computation (MPC), not an RPC, explorer, oracle, or bridge.
Custody model: Wallets are non-custodial, using 2-of-2 MPC to split key material so no single party — neither Para nor the integrating app — ever holds the complete private key.
Onboarding & authentication: Users get wallets with no seed phrase, signing in via email/social login or biometric passkeys instead of managing key material directly.
Cross-app portability: Para offers portable 'universal' wallets — a single wallet a user can carry across every app that integrates Para, rather than a separate, siloed wallet per app.

The record

How they compare

Field	MetaMask	Para
Type	infrastructure	infrastructure
Category	Wallets & Custody	Wallets & Custody
Status	active	active
Chains	—	—
Website	Yes	Yes
Docs	—	—
GitHub	—	—
Confidence	97%	80%
Sources	3	8

Read on

MetaMask profile →Para profile →Alternatives to MetaMask →Alternatives to Para →All Wallets & Custody →

Answers

MetaMask vs Para: questions

What is the difference between MetaMask and Para on Tempo?: MetaMask is The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.. Para is Embedded MPC wallets across apps.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.
Is MetaMask or Para live on Tempo?: Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — MetaMask is active and Para is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
Should I choose MetaMask or Para?: It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (MetaMask: 97%, Para: 80%), then read each full profile before deciding.