Side by side
Goldsky vs SQD
Goldsky and SQD both operate in the Indexers & Data part of the Tempo ecosystem. Goldsky — Real-time indexing and data streaming.. SQD — Decentralized data lake and indexing (Subsquid)..
Goldskyactive
Real-time indexing and data streaming.
- Category
- Managed blockchain data infrastructure providing subgraph indexing and real-time data pipelines/streaming for onchain applications.
- Multi-chain provider
- Operates across a broad range of blockchain networks; Tempo is one of many supported chains.
- Role on Tempo
- Goldsky supports Tempo as a network, giving Tempo builders hosted indexing and data-streaming infrastructure.
- Tempo products
- Goldsky Subgraphs (indexing / GraphQL) and Mirror (real-time data pipelines) are available for Tempo.
SQDactive
Decentralized data lake and indexing (Subsquid).
The record
How they compare
| Field | Goldsky | SQD |
|---|---|---|
| Type | infrastructure | infrastructure |
| Category | Indexers & Data | Indexers & Data |
| Status | active | active |
| Chains | — | — |
| Website | Yes | Yes |
| Docs | — | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| Confidence | 85% | 62% |
| Sources | 4 | 0 |
Read on
Answers
Goldsky vs SQD: questions
- What is the difference between Goldsky and SQD on Tempo?
- Goldsky is Real-time indexing and data streaming.. SQD is Decentralized data lake and indexing (Subsquid).. Both sit in the Indexers & Data part of the Tempo ecosystem.
- Is Goldsky or SQD live on Tempo?
- Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Goldsky is active and SQD is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
- Should I choose Goldsky or SQD?
- It depends on your use case — both serve the Indexers & Data role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Goldsky: 85%, SQD: 62%), then read each full profile before deciding.