What is the difference between Fireblocks and ZeroDev on Tempo?

Fireblocks is Institutional digital-asset custody and operations.. ZeroDev is Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.

Is Fireblocks or ZeroDev live on Tempo?

Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Fireblocks is active and ZeroDev is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.

Should I choose Fireblocks or ZeroDev?

It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Fireblocks: 79%, ZeroDev: 92%), then read each full profile before deciding.

Side by side

Fireblocks vs ZeroDev

Fireblocks and ZeroDev both operate in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem. Fireblocks — Institutional digital-asset custody and operations.. ZeroDev — Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure..

Fireblocksactive

Institutional digital-asset custody and operations.

Category: Institutional MPC-based wallet, custody, and key-management infrastructure (Wallet-as-a-Service) — not an RPC, explorer, oracle, or bridge.
What it does: Digital-asset and stablecoin infrastructure that lets businesses custody, transfer, and manage on-chain operations through a single platform.
Security model: Secures keys with multi-party computation (MPC-CMP) instead of a single private key, paired with a configurable policy engine for transaction governance.
Role on Tempo: Listed in the Tempo ecosystem under Wallets & Custodians as an institutional custody / key-management infrastructure partner for payment flows.

ZeroDevactive

Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure.

Category: ZeroDev is infrastructure for wallet smart accounts and account abstraction.
Tempo ecosystem role: ZeroDev is identified as account-abstraction infrastructure in the Tempo ecosystem.
Supported account-abstraction standards: ZeroDev supports ERC-4337 and EIP-7702 smart-account infrastructure.
Modular smart accounts: ZeroDev's Kernel smart account is associated with ERC-4337-compatible and ERC-7579-modular smart-account functionality.

The record

How they compare

Field	Fireblocks	ZeroDev
Type	infrastructure	infrastructure
Category	Wallets & Custody	Wallets & Custody
Status	active	active
Chains	—	—
Website	Yes	Yes
Docs	—	—
GitHub	—	—
Confidence	79%	92%
Sources	7	4

Read on

Fireblocks profile →ZeroDev profile →Alternatives to Fireblocks →Alternatives to ZeroDev →All Wallets & Custody →

Answers

Fireblocks vs ZeroDev: questions

What is the difference between Fireblocks and ZeroDev on Tempo?: Fireblocks is Institutional digital-asset custody and operations.. ZeroDev is Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.
Is Fireblocks or ZeroDev live on Tempo?: Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Fireblocks is active and ZeroDev is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
Should I choose Fireblocks or ZeroDev?: It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Fireblocks: 79%, ZeroDev: 92%), then read each full profile before deciding.