Is Dynamic or ZeroDev live on Tempo?

Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Dynamic is active and ZeroDev is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.

Should I choose Dynamic or ZeroDev?

It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Dynamic: 86%, ZeroDev: 92%), then read each full profile before deciding.

Side by side

Dynamic vs ZeroDev

Dynamic and ZeroDev both operate in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem. Dynamic — Embedded wallets and auth for apps.. ZeroDev — Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure..

Dynamicactive

Embedded wallets and auth for apps.

Category: Wallet and authentication infrastructure — a developer platform (wallet-as-a-service) delivering embedded wallets plus login/auth.
Core product: Provides user-owned embedded wallets with email and social sign-in (no single party holds the full key), so end users get a wallet without managing seed phrases; apps integrate via SDKs/components.
Chain support: Multi-chain: supports all EVM networks with custom RPC configuration through its SDKs and wallet connectors.
Role on Tempo: Acts as embedded-wallet and authentication infrastructure for apps building on Tempo (an EVM-compatible chain) in the wallets/auth segment of the ecosystem.

ZeroDevactive

Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure.

Category: ZeroDev is infrastructure for wallet smart accounts and account abstraction.
Tempo ecosystem role: ZeroDev is identified as account-abstraction infrastructure in the Tempo ecosystem.
Supported account-abstraction standards: ZeroDev supports ERC-4337 and EIP-7702 smart-account infrastructure.
Modular smart accounts: ZeroDev's Kernel smart account is associated with ERC-4337-compatible and ERC-7579-modular smart-account functionality.

The record

How they compare

Field	Dynamic	ZeroDev
Type	infrastructure	infrastructure
Category	Wallets & Custody	Wallets & Custody
Status	active	active
Chains	—	—
Website	Yes	Yes
Docs	—	—
GitHub	—	—
Confidence	86%	92%
Sources	5	4

Read on

Dynamic profile →ZeroDev profile →Alternatives to Dynamic →Alternatives to ZeroDev →All Wallets & Custody →

Answers

Dynamic vs ZeroDev: questions

What is the difference between Dynamic and ZeroDev on Tempo?: Dynamic is Embedded wallets and auth for apps.. ZeroDev is Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.
Is Dynamic or ZeroDev live on Tempo?: Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Dynamic is active and ZeroDev is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
Should I choose Dynamic or ZeroDev?: It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Dynamic: 86%, ZeroDev: 92%), then read each full profile before deciding.