Side by side
DFNS vs ZeroDev
DFNS and ZeroDev both operate in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem. DFNS — Wallet-as-a-service with policy controls.. ZeroDev — Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure..
DFNSactive
Wallet-as-a-service with policy controls.
- Role on Tempo
- Institutional wallet-as-a-service (WaaS) and custody / key-management infrastructure for teams building on Tempo
- Key security model
- Uses multi-party computation (MPC) for transaction signing
- Policy & access controls
- Provides a policy engine and granular access controls for transaction governance
- Tempo networks supported
- Supports the TempoAndantino and TempoModerato networks
ZeroDevactive
Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure.
- Category
- ZeroDev is infrastructure for wallet smart accounts and account abstraction.
- Tempo ecosystem role
- ZeroDev is identified as account-abstraction infrastructure in the Tempo ecosystem.
- Supported account-abstraction standards
- ZeroDev supports ERC-4337 and EIP-7702 smart-account infrastructure.
- Modular smart accounts
- ZeroDev's Kernel smart account is associated with ERC-4337-compatible and ERC-7579-modular smart-account functionality.
The record
How they compare
| Field | DFNS | ZeroDev |
|---|---|---|
| Type | infrastructure | infrastructure |
| Category | Wallets & Custody | Wallets & Custody |
| Status | active | active |
| Chains | — | — |
| Website | Yes | Yes |
| Docs | — | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| Confidence | 89% | 92% |
| Sources | 4 | 4 |
Read on
Answers
DFNS vs ZeroDev: questions
- What is the difference between DFNS and ZeroDev on Tempo?
- DFNS is Wallet-as-a-service with policy controls.. ZeroDev is Account-abstraction toolkit and smart-account infrastructure.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.
- Is DFNS or ZeroDev live on Tempo?
- Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — DFNS is active and ZeroDev is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
- Should I choose DFNS or ZeroDev?
- It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (DFNS: 89%, ZeroDev: 92%), then read each full profile before deciding.