Vol. 1 · 7 Jun 2026
Side by side

DFNS vs Safe

DFNS and Safe both operate in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem. DFNSWallet-as-a-service with policy controls.. Safe The standard smart-account (multisig) for EVM treasuries..

DFNS logo
DFNSactive

Wallet-as-a-service with policy controls.

Role on Tempo
Institutional wallet-as-a-service (WaaS) and custody / key-management infrastructure for teams building on Tempo
Key security model
Uses multi-party computation (MPC) for transaction signing
Policy & access controls
Provides a policy engine and granular access controls for transaction governance
Tempo networks supported
Supports the TempoAndantino and TempoModerato networks
Safe logo
Safeactive

The standard smart-account (multisig) for EVM treasuries.

Category
Wallets & Custodians / Infrastructure
Status
Mainnet (Active)
Role on Tempo
Standard smart account and multisig infrastructure for programmable treasury management and stablecoin payment operations.
Gas Model
Tempo has no native gas token; transaction fees are paid in USD-denominated stablecoins (e.g., USDC) via native account abstraction.

The record

How they compare

FieldDFNSSafe
Typeinfrastructureinfrastructure
CategoryWallets & CustodyWallets & Custody
Statusactiveactive
Chains
WebsiteYesYes
Docs
GitHub
Confidence89%100%
Sources45

Read on


Answers

DFNS vs Safe: questions

What is the difference between DFNS and Safe on Tempo?
DFNS is Wallet-as-a-service with policy controls.. Safe is The standard smart-account (multisig) for EVM treasuries.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.
Is DFNS or Safe live on Tempo?
Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — DFNS is active and Safe is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
Should I choose DFNS or Safe?
It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (DFNS: 89%, Safe: 100%), then read each full profile before deciding.