Vol. 1 · 7 Jun 2026
Side by side

DFNS vs MetaMask

DFNS and MetaMask both operate in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem. DFNSWallet-as-a-service with policy controls.. MetaMask The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet..

DFNS logo
DFNSactive

Wallet-as-a-service with policy controls.

Role on Tempo
Institutional wallet-as-a-service (WaaS) and custody / key-management infrastructure for teams building on Tempo
Key security model
Uses multi-party computation (MPC) for transaction signing
Policy & access controls
Provides a policy engine and granular access controls for transaction governance
Tempo networks supported
Supports the TempoAndantino and TempoModerato networks
MetaMask logo
MetaMaskactive

The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.

Developer
Developed by and part of Consensys.
Tempo connection details
Tempo Mainnet uses chain ID 4217, RPC https://rpc.tempo.xyz, and USD as the currency symbol.
Fees on Tempo
Tempo has no native gas token; transaction fees in MetaMask are paid in USD-denominated stablecoins such as pathUSD.

The record

How they compare

FieldDFNSMetaMask
Typeinfrastructureinfrastructure
CategoryWallets & CustodyWallets & Custody
Statusactiveactive
Chains
WebsiteYesYes
Docs
GitHub
Confidence89%97%
Sources43

Read on


Answers

DFNS vs MetaMask: questions

What is the difference between DFNS and MetaMask on Tempo?
DFNS is Wallet-as-a-service with policy controls.. MetaMask is The most widely used self-custody EVM wallet.. Both sit in the Wallets & Custody part of the Tempo ecosystem.
Is DFNS or MetaMask live on Tempo?
Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — DFNS is active and MetaMask is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
Should I choose DFNS or MetaMask?
It depends on your use case — both serve the Wallets & Custody role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (DFNS: 89%, MetaMask: 97%), then read each full profile before deciding.