Side by side
Conduit vs Luganodes
Conduit and Luganodes both operate in the RPC & Node Infrastructure part of the Tempo ecosystem. Conduit — Rollup and node infrastructure provider.. Luganodes — Institutional-grade validator infrastructure..
Conduitactive
Rollup and node infrastructure provider.
- Role on Tempo
- RPC and node infrastructure provider; supplies managed RPC/node access so developers can connect applications to Tempo without running their own nodes.
- Mainnet Chain ID
- Tempo Mainnet is documented with chain ID 4217.
- Testnet
- Tempo Testnet 'Moderato' is documented with chain ID 42431.
- Endpoint access
- Developers create an API key in the Conduit app (app.conduit.xyz) to obtain an authenticated Tempo RPC endpoint URL.
Luganodesactive
Institutional-grade validator infrastructure.
- Company Profile
- Swiss-operated, non-custodial blockchain infrastructure provider.
- Security & Compliance
- Maintains ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, and GDPR compliance.
- Supported Networks
- Supports non-custodial node operations across 40+ Proof-of-Stake networks.
- Tempo Network Status
- Tempo public testnet is active.
The record
How they compare
| Field | Conduit | Luganodes |
|---|---|---|
| Type | infrastructure | infrastructure |
| Category | RPC & Node Infrastructure | Validators |
| Status | active | active |
| Chains | — | — |
| Website | Yes | Yes |
| Docs | — | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| Confidence | 98% | 86% |
| Sources | 4 | 4 |
Read on
Answers
Conduit vs Luganodes: questions
- What is the difference between Conduit and Luganodes on Tempo?
- Conduit is Rollup and node infrastructure provider.. Luganodes is Institutional-grade validator infrastructure.. Both sit in the RPC & Node Infrastructure part of the Tempo ecosystem.
- Is Conduit or Luganodes live on Tempo?
- Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Conduit is active and Luganodes is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
- Should I choose Conduit or Luganodes?
- It depends on your use case — both serve the RPC & Node Infrastructure role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Conduit: 98%, Luganodes: 86%), then read each full profile before deciding.