Side by side
Conduit vs dRPC
Conduit and dRPC both operate in the RPC & Node Infrastructure part of the Tempo ecosystem. Conduit — Rollup and node infrastructure provider.. dRPC — Decentralized RPC with smart routing..
Conduitactive
Rollup and node infrastructure provider.
- Role on Tempo
- RPC and node infrastructure provider; supplies managed RPC/node access so developers can connect applications to Tempo without running their own nodes.
- Mainnet Chain ID
- Tempo Mainnet is documented with chain ID 4217.
- Testnet
- Tempo Testnet 'Moderato' is documented with chain ID 42431.
- Endpoint access
- Developers create an API key in the Conduit app (app.conduit.xyz) to obtain an authenticated Tempo RPC endpoint URL.
dRPCactive
Decentralized RPC with smart routing.
- Infrastructure Architecture
- Utilizes AI-powered load balancing to route requests across its nodes.
- Status
- Active
The record
How they compare
| Field | Conduit | dRPC |
|---|---|---|
| Type | infrastructure | infrastructure |
| Category | RPC & Node Infrastructure | RPC & Node Infrastructure |
| Status | active | active |
| Chains | — | — |
| Website | Yes | Yes |
| Docs | — | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| Confidence | 98% | 96% |
| Sources | 4 | 1 |
Keep exploring
Answers
Conduit vs dRPC: questions
- What is the difference between Conduit and dRPC on Tempo?
- Conduit is Rollup and node infrastructure provider.. dRPC is Decentralized RPC with smart routing.. Both sit in the RPC & Node Infrastructure part of the Tempo ecosystem.
- Is Conduit or dRPC live on Tempo?
- Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Conduit is active and dRPC is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
- Should I choose Conduit or dRPC?
- It depends on your use case — both serve the RPC & Node Infrastructure role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Conduit: 98%, dRPC: 96%), then read each full profile before deciding.