Side by side
Bridge vs Conduit Pay
Bridge and Conduit Pay both operate in the Payments & Fintech part of the Tempo ecosystem. Bridge — Stablecoin orchestration infrastructure, acquired by Stripe.. Conduit Pay — Unified fiat and stablecoin payment API..
Bridgeactive
Stablecoin orchestration infrastructure, acquired by Stripe.
- Founded
- 2022
- Founders
- Zach Abrams and Sean Yu
- Ownership
- Acquired by Stripe; acquisition completed in February 2025
- What it does
- Stablecoin infrastructure providing APIs for businesses to receive, store, convert, issue, spend, and pay out stablecoins
Conduit Payactive
Unified fiat and stablecoin payment API.
- Founded
- 2021
- What it does
- B2B cross-border payments and fiat-to-stablecoin payment infrastructure.
- Role on Tempo
- On-ramp/off-ramp infrastructure partner connecting fiat with stablecoins for the Tempo network.
- Core products
- A global USD payments/payouts API and virtual USD accounts.
The record
How they compare
| Field | Bridge | Conduit Pay |
|---|---|---|
| Type | payments app | payments app |
| Category | Payments & Fintech | Payments & Fintech |
| Status | active | active |
| Chains | — | — |
| Website | Yes | Yes |
| Docs | — | — |
| GitHub | — | — |
| Confidence | 95% | 81% |
| Sources | 4 | 5 |
Read on
Answers
Bridge vs Conduit Pay: questions
- What is the difference between Bridge and Conduit Pay on Tempo?
- Bridge is Stablecoin orchestration infrastructure, acquired by Stripe.. Conduit Pay is Unified fiat and stablecoin payment API.. Both sit in the Payments & Fintech part of the Tempo ecosystem.
- Is Bridge or Conduit Pay live on Tempo?
- Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Bridge is active and Conduit Pay is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
- Should I choose Bridge or Conduit Pay?
- It depends on your use case — both serve the Payments & Fintech role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Bridge: 95%, Conduit Pay: 81%), then read each full profile before deciding.