Vol. 1 · 7 Jun 2026
Side by side

Artemis vs Goldsky

Artemis and Goldsky both operate in the Indexers & Data part of the Tempo ecosystem. ArtemisCross-chain fundamental metrics.. Goldsky Real-time indexing and data streaming..

Artemis logo
Artemisactive

Cross-chain fundamental metrics.

Category
On-chain Data & Analytics Platform
Core Products
Artemis Terminal, Artemis Sheets, and Artemis API
Role on Tempo
Provides fundamental data, on-chain metrics, and analytics dashboards for the network
Goldsky logo
Goldskyactive

Real-time indexing and data streaming.

Category
Managed blockchain data infrastructure providing subgraph indexing and real-time data pipelines/streaming for onchain applications.
Multi-chain provider
Operates across a broad range of blockchain networks; Tempo is one of many supported chains.
Role on Tempo
Goldsky supports Tempo as a network, giving Tempo builders hosted indexing and data-streaming infrastructure.
Tempo products
Goldsky Subgraphs (indexing / GraphQL) and Mirror (real-time data pipelines) are available for Tempo.

The record

How they compare

FieldArtemisGoldsky
Typeinfrastructureinfrastructure
CategoryIndexers & DataIndexers & Data
Statusactiveactive
Chains
WebsiteYesYes
Docs
GitHub
Confidence98%85%
Sources34

Read on


Answers

Artemis vs Goldsky: questions

What is the difference between Artemis and Goldsky on Tempo?
Artemis is Cross-chain fundamental metrics.. Goldsky is Real-time indexing and data streaming.. Both sit in the Indexers & Data part of the Tempo ecosystem.
Is Artemis or Goldsky live on Tempo?
Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Artemis is active and Goldsky is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
Should I choose Artemis or Goldsky?
It depends on your use case — both serve the Indexers & Data role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Artemis: 98%, Goldsky: 85%), then read each full profile before deciding.