Vol. 1 · 7 Jun 2026

Side by side

Alchemy vs Chainstack

Alchemy and Chainstack both operate in the RPC & Node Infrastructure part of the Tempo ecosystem. AlchemyDeveloper platform and RPC for EVM chains.. Chainstack SOC 2-certified RPC and node services..

Alchemy logo
Alchemyactive

Developer platform and RPC for EVM chains.

What it is
Alchemy is a blockchain developer-infrastructure provider offering managed node infrastructure and RPC endpoints.
Tempo Mainnet support
Supports Tempo Mainnet, chain ID 4217.
Tempo testnet support
Supports the Tempo Moderato testnet, chain ID 42431.
Status
Active — both Tempo Mainnet and the Moderato testnet are reported as operational on Alchemy.
Chainstack logo

SOC 2-certified RPC and node services.

Tempo partner status
Listed as an infrastructure partner in the Tempo ecosystem.
Supported networks
Provides RPC endpoints for both Tempo Mainnet and the Moderato Testnet.
Tempo chain IDs
Tempo Mainnet uses chain ID 4217; the Moderato Testnet uses chain ID 42431.
Security attestation
SOC 2 Type II certified for its blockchain infrastructure platform (as of December 2025).

The record

How they compare

FieldAlchemyChainstack
Typeinfrastructureinfrastructure
CategoryRPC & Node InfrastructureRPC & Node Infrastructure
Statusactiveactive
Chains
WebsiteYesYes
Docs
GitHub
Confidence93%89%
Sources35

Read on


Answers

Alchemy vs Chainstack: questions

What is the difference between Alchemy and Chainstack on Tempo?
Alchemy is Developer platform and RPC for EVM chains.. Chainstack is SOC 2-certified RPC and node services.. Both sit in the RPC & Node Infrastructure part of the Tempo ecosystem.
Is Alchemy or Chainstack live on Tempo?
Neither is confirmed on Tempo mainnet yet — Alchemy is active and Chainstack is active. Status is tracked from primary sources.
Should I choose Alchemy or Chainstack?
It depends on your use case — both serve the RPC & Node Infrastructure role on Tempo. Compare them on type, status, chains, integrations and source-backed confidence (Alchemy: 93%, Chainstack: 89%), then read each full profile before deciding.