<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>tempowiki — Articles</title>
    <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles</link>
    <description>Sourced, neutral explainers on stablecoins, cross-border payments, regulation, and the chains that move digital dollars. tempowiki is independent and sourced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Tempo vs Tron for stablecoin payments</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/tempo-vs-tron-for-stablecoin-payments</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/tempo-vs-tron-for-stablecoin-payments</guid>
      <category>Chains compared</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Tron carries the most stablecoin volume in the world today; Tempo is a payments-first chain built from scratch for the job. Here is how they compare on fees, finality, and design — and which fits which use.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is a stablecoin?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/what-is-a-stablecoin</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/what-is-a-stablecoin</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A stablecoin is a cryptocurrency designed to hold a steady value — almost always one US dollar — by being backed by reserves or managed by code. They are how dollars move on a blockchain.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to accept stablecoin payments as a business</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/accept-stablecoin-payments-business</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/accept-stablecoin-payments-business</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Accepting stablecoins as a business means choosing a gateway or wallet, connecting an off-ramp, handling accounting, and building a settlement workflow — all of which are solvable problems with established tooling in 2026.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoins in Africa: cross-border payments and dollarization</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/africa-stablecoins-cross-border</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/africa-stablecoins-cross-border</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Sub-Saharan Africa pays the world&apos;s highest remittance fees — averaging 7.9% — and has the fewest banking options. Stablecoins are filling both gaps, with USDT adoption accelerating across Nigeria, Ghana, Kenya, and Egypt.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Agentic commerce: what it means for businesses that sell services</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/agentic-commerce-for-businesses</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/agentic-commerce-for-businesses</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Agentic commerce is the pattern where AI agents — acting on behalf of a human buyer — research, select, and complete purchases without step-by-step human approval. For businesses that sell services or data, this creates a new class of buyer: software that pays programmatically, expects machine-readable pricing and catalogs, and has no patience for checkout flows designed for humans. Businesses that expose agent-accessible APIs and accept stablecoin payments via protocols like x402 or MPP can capture this buyer class; those that don&apos;t will be bypassed.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The infrastructure behind agentic payments: wallets, keys, and settlement</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/agentic-payments-infrastructure</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/agentic-payments-infrastructure</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Agentic payments require three infrastructure layers working together: a wallet the agent can sign transactions from, a key custody model that protects that wallet without requiring human interaction, and a settlement chain that confirms payments in under a second for fractions of a cent. Without all three, autonomous machine-to-machine payments at scale are not viable. This article explains each layer and the design choices operators face when deploying AI agents that spend money.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How AI agents use stablecoins to pay for APIs and services</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/ai-agents-pay-apis-stablecoins</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/ai-agents-pay-apis-stablecoins</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>AI agents pay for APIs and services by holding funded stablecoin wallets and executing payments inline with HTTP requests — no human approval at each step, no merchant account required. Two open protocols, Coinbase&apos;s x402 and Tempo&apos;s Machine Payments Protocol (MPP), define the handshake. The agent sends a request, receives a price challenge, signs a stablecoin payment, and retries — the whole exchange fits inside a single HTTP cycle.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Argentina&apos;s stablecoin economy: how USDT became a shadow dollar</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/argentina-stablecoin-usdt-shadow-dollar</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/argentina-stablecoin-usdt-shadow-dollar</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Argentina has the world&apos;s most intense stablecoin economy relative to its size. With inflation that exceeded 200% in 2023, capital controls on physical dollars, and a parallel FX market built into daily life, USDT and USDC filled the gap that the peso could not.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>B2B stablecoin payments: the complete business guide</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/b2b-stablecoin-payments-guide</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/b2b-stablecoin-payments-guide</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoin rails let businesses settle supplier invoices, fund marketplace payouts, and automate AR/AP in seconds at a fraction of wire costs — with the compliance and accounting framework now mature enough for enterprise adoption.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why banks are building on stablecoin rails (not fighting them)</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/banks-building-stablecoin-rails</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/banks-building-stablecoin-rails</guid>
      <category>Payments</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The largest US banks announced a joint tokenized deposit network in 2026. Visa and Standard Chartered are now blockchain validators. Coastal Bank settles cross-border payments on-chain. Banks are not fighting stablecoin infrastructure — they are building on it, because the economics of 24/7 instant settlement are too good to leave to fintech alone.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The best corridors for stablecoin payments in 2026</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/best-stablecoin-payment-corridors</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/best-stablecoin-payment-corridors</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoin infrastructure is unevenly distributed. The US–Mexico corridor is the most mature, with Bitso handling over 10% of total corridor volume. US–Philippines, US–Nigeria, and US–India have strong on-ramp coverage but varying off-ramp depth. European cross-border flows benefit from MiCA-compliant issuers. Emerging corridors in Southeast Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa are developing fast.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Best stablecoin wallets in 2026</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/best-stablecoin-wallets-2026</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/best-stablecoin-wallets-2026</guid>
      <category>Infrastructure</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A stablecoin wallet is software that holds your private keys and signs transactions — or, in the custodial case, a service that does both on your behalf. The right wallet depends on how much control you want, which chains you use, and whether you need institutional-grade custody or just a quick way to send USDC.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The biggest stablecoin failures, and what they taught the market</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/biggest-stablecoin-failures</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/biggest-stablecoin-failures</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Three stablecoin designs have failed publicly and at scale: algorithmic coins with no reserve (TerraUSD, ~$40B lost), partially-collateralised hybrids (Iron Finance, ~$2B), and fiat-backed coins whose reserves were temporarily inaccessible (USDC/SVB, recovered). The lessons shaped both regulation and the architecture of the coins that followed.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Can stablecoins replace SWIFT?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/can-stablecoins-replace-swift</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/can-stablecoins-replace-swift</guid>
      <category>Payments</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoins settle in seconds for fractions of a cent; SWIFT moves trillions of dollars a day through 11,000 connected institutions. They solve different parts of the same problem — and the realistic outcome in 2026 is coexistence, not replacement.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to convert stablecoins to cash (off-ramp guide)</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/convert-stablecoin-to-cash</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/convert-stablecoin-to-cash</guid>
      <category>Infrastructure</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Converting stablecoins to cash means choosing a route — centralized exchange, issuer direct redemption, or a third-party ramp — then waiting for a bank wire or ACH to arrive. The fastest routes take minutes; the cheapest take two business days. Fees range from zero to 5% depending on the path.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How much does it cost to send $1,000 internationally?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/cost-send-1000-internationally</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/cost-send-1000-internationally</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Sending $1,000 internationally costs anywhere from under $5 to over $70 depending on the corridor, method, and provider. Here are worked examples for three major corridors with verified fee data.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>DeFi lending explained: how to earn and borrow against stablecoins</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/defi-lending-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/defi-lending-explained</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>DeFi lending lets you deposit stablecoins into a smart-contract pool and earn interest paid by borrowers — without a bank in the middle. Borrowers must post over-collateralised crypto, which gets liquidated automatically if values fall. Aave, Compound, and Morpho collectively held over $30 billion in deposits by mid-2026. The yield is real, but so are the risks: smart-contract exploits, liquidation cascades, and rate volatility mean DeFi lending is not equivalent to a savings account.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Digital dollarization: what happens when emerging markets adopt USD stablecoins</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/digital-dollarization-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/digital-dollarization-explained</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>When residents of an emerging economy save and transact in USD stablecoins rather than local currency, their central bank loses control of monetary policy — a dynamic economists call digital dollarization. Here is what it means, why it happens, and what countries are doing about it.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to earn interest on USDC and USDT</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/earn-interest-usdc-usdt</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/earn-interest-usdc-usdt</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>You can earn interest on USDC and USDT by supplying them to a DeFi lending protocol, depositing at a centralised lending platform, or using an issuer reward program. Major DeFi protocols pay roughly 3.5–7% APY in June 2026; centralised platforms quote 6.5–12%; issuer programs vary. Each route carries a distinct risk profile.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EVM compatibility explained: why it matters for stablecoin apps</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/evm-compatibility-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/evm-compatibility-explained</guid>
      <category>Chains compared</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>EVM compatibility means a blockchain can run the same smart contracts and tooling as Ethereum. For stablecoin applications, it means a USDC or USDT contract deployed on Ethereum can be redeployed on any EVM-compatible chain — Base, Polygon, Tempo — with minimal changes. Chains without EVM compatibility (Tron, Solana) require rewrites. EVM compatibility has become the default expectation for any chain seeking to attract stablecoin infrastructure.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The GENIUS Act explained: US stablecoin regulation in 2026</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/genius-act-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/genius-act-explained</guid>
      <category>Regulation</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The GENIUS Act, signed into law on 18 July 2025, is the United States&apos; first federal framework for payment stablecoins. It requires 100% liquid reserves, monthly public disclosures, Bank Secrecy Act compliance, and a licensed-issuer system split between federal (OCC) and state pathways. Only permitted issuers may offer stablecoins to US persons.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What the GENIUS Act means for stablecoin issuers</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/genius-act-stablecoin-issuers</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/genius-act-stablecoin-issuers</guid>
      <category>Regulation</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The GENIUS Act, signed into law on 18 July 2025, sets binding rules for anyone who wants to issue a payment stablecoin for US persons: mandatory licensing through one of three pathways, 100% reserve backing with a defined asset list, monthly public disclosures examined by a registered accountant, timely redemption procedures, and an explicit prohibition on paying holders interest. Existing issuers have a transition period; new entrants must comply from launch.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GENIUS Act vs MiCA: how US and EU stablecoin rules compare</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/genius-act-vs-mica</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/genius-act-vs-mica</guid>
      <category>Regulation</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The US GENIUS Act (signed July 2025) and the EU&apos;s MiCA (fully in force December 2024) are the two most consequential stablecoin regulatory frameworks in the world. Both require 100% reserve backing and issuer licensing, but they differ sharply on reserve composition, who regulates whom, how foreign issuers are treated, and what happens to yield. This article maps the differences side by side.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A brief history of stablecoins: from Tether (2014) to the GENIUS Act</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/history-of-stablecoins</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/history-of-stablecoins</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoins began as a trader&apos;s tool to park value on exchanges without leaving crypto. Over twelve years they evolved into payment infrastructure moving tens of trillions of dollars annually, acquired regulatory frameworks in the US and EU, and attracted institutional issuers from PayPal to Ripple. The arc runs from Tether&apos;s 2014 launch through the TerraUSD collapse to the GENIUS Act of 2025.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How do stablecoins keep their peg?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/how-stablecoins-keep-their-peg</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/how-stablecoins-keep-their-peg</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoins hold their $1 value through a combination of liquid reserve backing, continuous arbitrage, and — for crypto-collateralised designs — on-chain liquidation engines. Each mechanism has a failure mode; the TerraUSD collapse of 2022 is the definitive case study in what happens when the mechanism is circular rather than anchored.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to buy USDC: a step-by-step guide</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/how-to-buy-usdc</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/how-to-buy-usdc</guid>
      <category>Infrastructure</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Buying USDC takes three steps: create and verify an account on an exchange or use Circle directly, deposit fiat using a bank transfer or debit card, and convert to USDC. Coinbase converts USD to USDC with no fee or spread because Circle and Coinbase co-founded the USDC consortium. Other exchanges charge 0.9–1% for instant buy or 0.25–0.40% via a limit order. Debit card purchases add 3–4% on top.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to read a stablecoin reserve report</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/how-to-read-stablecoin-reserve-report</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/how-to-read-stablecoin-reserve-report</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A stablecoin reserve report — properly called an attestation — is a point-in-time snapshot by an independent accounting firm confirming that the issuer held enough assets to cover every token in circulation on one specific date. Reading one correctly means understanding what it proves, what it does not prove, and what the reserve composition reveals about stability under stress.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Latin American remittance market — and why stablecoins are winning it</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/latam-remittances-stablecoin-market</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/latam-remittances-stablecoin-market</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Latin America received an estimated $174 billion in remittances in 2025, mostly from the United States. Traditional money transfer operators charge 5–6% on average. Stablecoin rails are cutting that to under 2% on active corridors — and settling in seconds instead of hours.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why Latin America leads the world in stablecoin adoption</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/latin-america-stablecoin-adoption</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/latin-america-stablecoin-adoption</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Latin America accounts for 7.7% of its own GDP in stablecoin flows — the highest ratio of any region — driven by inflation, currency controls, and a $174 billion annual remittance market.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Machine Payments Protocol (MPP), explained</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/machine-payments-protocol-mpp</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/machine-payments-protocol-mpp</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The Machine Payments Protocol (MPP) is an open standard, co-authored by Stripe and Tempo, that lets AI agents and software pay for services inline with an HTTP request. Its sessions mechanism collapses any number of micropayments into exactly two on-chain transactions — an open and a settle — making high-frequency machine payments economically viable.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MiCA explained: the EU&apos;s stablecoin regulation</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/mica-regulation-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/mica-regulation-explained</guid>
      <category>Regulation</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>MiCA — the EU&apos;s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation — is the world&apos;s broadest crypto-asset law. For stablecoins, the key rules took effect on 30 June 2024. It splits stablecoins into two categories (EMT and ART), requires issuer authorization, mandates 100% reserve backing, and restricts large stablecoins. CASPs serving EU users must be licensed by 30 December 2024.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How MiCA affects USDT in Europe — and what it means for your business</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/mica-usdt-europe-business</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/mica-usdt-europe-business</guid>
      <category>Regulation</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Tether&apos;s USDT is no longer available for trading on MiCA-regulated EU exchanges as of 31 March 2025, because Tether has not obtained MiCA authorization. USDC — authorized by Circle through a French EMI license in July 2024 — is the main MiCA-compliant dollar stablecoin available on European platforms. This article explains the regulatory basis, the practical exchange impact, and what businesses operating in Europe should do.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How stablecoin off-ramps work in emerging markets</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/off-ramps-emerging-markets</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/off-ramps-emerging-markets</guid>
      <category>Infrastructure</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Off-ramping stablecoins in emerging markets — converting USDT or USDC to local currency in your bank account or mobile wallet — works through a different infrastructure stack than in the US or Europe. The main routes are regional exchanges with local fiat corridors, mobile-money integrations, peer-to-peer platforms, and agent networks. Fees vary from 0.5% on liquid corridors to 4–8% where off-ramp infrastructure is thin. The critical variable is not the stablecoin — it is the last-mile delivery to cash.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to pay international contractors with stablecoins</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/pay-international-contractors-stablecoin</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/pay-international-contractors-stablecoin</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Paying international contractors in stablecoins settles in seconds for a fraction of a cent, sidesteps SWIFT delays and FX markups, and works in countries where banking access is thin. Here is how to do it compliantly, from classification to payout.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is programmable money? Stablecoins as internet-native dollars</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/programmable-money-stablecoins</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/programmable-money-stablecoins</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Programmable money is a unit of value whose movement is governed by code — smart contracts that release funds when predefined conditions are met, without manual authorization from a bank or person. Stablecoins are the practical implementation of programmable money today: dollar-pegged tokens on blockchains that combine the stability of a dollar with the programmability of software. USDC stood at $77.3 billion and USDT at $189.5 billion in late April 2026, with total stablecoin supply at $318 billion.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Real-world asset tokenization, explained</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/real-world-asset-tokenization</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/real-world-asset-tokenization</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Real-world asset (RWA) tokenization converts claims on off-chain assets — Treasury bills, private credit, real estate, commodities — into tokens on a public blockchain. The total on-chain tokenized RWA market (excluding stablecoins) reached roughly $24–31 billion by early-to-mid 2026, up from $6 billion at the start of 2025. US Treasuries and private credit dominate. The core argument for tokenization is operational: on-chain settlement, 24/7 transferability, and fractional ownership change the economics of asset distribution and collateral management. The risks are legal complexity, smart-contract exposure, and regulatory uncertainty that varies sharply by asset class and jurisdiction.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to send money internationally with stablecoins</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/send-money-internationally-stablecoin</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/send-money-internationally-stablecoin</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Sending money internationally with stablecoins takes four steps — on-ramp, hold, send, off-ramp — and can settle in under a second for a fraction of what a bank wire or money-transfer operator charges.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoins in Southeast Asia: adoption, regulation, and what&apos;s next</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/southeast-asia-stablecoins</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/southeast-asia-stablecoins</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Southeast Asia is the fastest-growing crypto region globally, with APAC posting 69% year-over-year growth in on-chain value in 2025. The Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia, and Thailand are emerging as distinct stablecoin markets with different regulatory postures and use cases.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>S&amp;P stablecoin stability ratings, explained</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/sp-stablecoin-stability-ratings</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/sp-stablecoin-stability-ratings</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>S&amp;P Global Ratings publishes Stablecoin Stability Assessments (SSAs) that score coins on a 1–5 scale based on reserve quality, governance, regulatory compliance, liquidity, and track record. No stablecoin has received a &apos;1 (very strong).&apos; USDC scored &apos;2 (strong)&apos;; USDT scored &apos;4 (constrained).&apos; The scores are not credit ratings and do not predict insolvency — they assess peg stability risk specifically.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin AML and sanctions compliance: what businesses need to know</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-aml-sanctions-compliance</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-aml-sanctions-compliance</guid>
      <category>Regulation</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Payment stablecoin issuers in the US are now treated as financial institutions under the Bank Secrecy Act, with mandatory AML/CFT programs and — for the first time — explicit statutory sanctions compliance obligations. A FinCEN/OFAC proposed rule published 10 April 2026 fills in the specifics: written programs, risk assessments, SAR filing at a $5,000 threshold, and technical controls to freeze and reject sanctioned transactions.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How banks adopted stablecoin rails in 2026</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-banking-adoption-2026</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-banking-adoption-2026</guid>
      <category>Payments</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>In 2025–2026, major banks moved from pilot announcements to production stablecoin infrastructure. JPMorgan launched JPMD on Base for institutional clients. European banks formed a 37-bank consortium, Qivalis, targeting a MiCA-compliant euro stablecoin. Visa and Mastercard expanded settlement capabilities. SWIFT ran blockchain pilots with nine US institutions. The GENIUS Act cleared the legal path for US bank-issued stablecoins.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blockchains for stablecoin payments, compared: Tron, Ethereum, Solana, Base, and Tempo</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-chains-comparison</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-chains-comparison</guid>
      <category>Chains compared</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Five chains carry the overwhelming majority of stablecoin volume in 2026. They differ sharply on fees, finality, throughput, gas-token design, and who they are actually built for. This is the complete comparison.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin counterparty risk: how to evaluate your exposure</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-counterparty-risk</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-counterparty-risk</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Holding a stablecoin means trusting multiple parties simultaneously: the issuer, the reserve custodians, the chain&apos;s validators, and — if you use a centralised exchange — the exchange itself. Each layer adds counterparty exposure. Mapping and sizing those exposures is the core of stablecoin risk management for businesses and serious holders.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin payments for e-commerce: Shopify, Stripe, and beyond</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-ecommerce-payments</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-ecommerce-payments</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoin acceptance has moved from crypto-native niche to mainstream e-commerce infrastructure. Shopify launched USDC payments on Base in June 2025 through a partnership with Stripe and Coinbase, letting merchants accept USDC at checkout and settle in local currency or hold stablecoins directly. Stripe expanded stablecoin acceptance to 70+ countries by Q1 2026. Both integrations settle in seconds, charge no foreign transaction fees, and do not require merchants to manage crypto wallets if they prefer fiat payouts.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin invoice and payment automation, explained</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-invoice-payment-automation</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-invoice-payment-automation</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoin payment automation replaces manual invoice-to-settlement workflows with programmable rules: send USDC when an invoice is approved, release escrowed funds when a milestone is verified, sweep excess balance to yield overnight. Settlement clears in seconds on the chosen chain for less than a dollar in network fees — compared with one to three business days for SWIFT and ACH. This article explains how stablecoin invoice automation works, which components are required, and how to implement a basic automated payment flow.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin on-ramp fees compared: Coinbase, Kraken, Circle, and more</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-on-ramp-fees-compared</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-on-ramp-fees-compared</guid>
      <category>Infrastructure</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>On-ramp fees vary by platform and payment method. Coinbase charges zero to convert USD to USDC via ACH bank transfer — the cheapest retail path. Kraken charges 1% for instant buy plus a debit-card surcharge of 3–4%. Circle Mint charges nothing for direct institutional issuance under $40M per day. Third-party ramps (MoonPay, Transak) bundle fees into a spread of 1–5% depending on method. Your all-in cost depends on payment rail, amount, and whether you use the simple interface or professional trading.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin payroll: a guide for employers</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-payroll-employer-guide</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-payroll-employer-guide</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Paying employees or contractors in stablecoins is legal, tax-compliant, and operationally straightforward — if you handle worker classification, KYC, withholding, and batch workflow correctly. This guide covers each step.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin regulation by country: a 2026 global map</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-regulation-by-country</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-regulation-by-country</guid>
      <category>Regulation</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Eight major jurisdictions have enacted or finalized stablecoin-specific regulatory frameworks as of mid-2026: the United States (GENIUS Act, July 2025), the EU (MiCA, December 2024), Hong Kong (Stablecoins Ordinance, August 2025), UAE (PTSR, July 2024), Singapore (MAS SCS framework, August 2023), Japan (amended Payment Services Act, June 2023, further amended 2025), UK (framework expected 2026–2027), and Brazil (BCB resolutions, November 2025). This article maps the status, key rules, and licensing body for each.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin remittances: a guide for families sending money home</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-remittances-guide</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-remittances-guide</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Sending money internationally via stablecoins typically costs under 1% of the transfer amount and settles in minutes. Traditional wire transfers and agent networks charge 5–7% on average and can take 1–5 days. This guide covers how stablecoin remittances work, which corridors have the best coverage, what the receiver needs, and what to watch out for.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What are stablecoin reserves, and how do you check them?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-reserves-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-reserves-explained</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoin reserves are the assets an issuer holds to back each token at $1. Understanding what is in those reserves, how attestations differ from full audits, and where to find the primary sources lets you evaluate any stablecoin on its own evidence rather than its marketing.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin risks: what every user and business should know</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-risks-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-risks-explained</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoins carry real risk despite the word &apos;stable.&apos; The risks vary by design — reserve quality and issuer solvency for fiat-backed coins, collateral crashes for crypto-backed, and reflexive collapse for algorithmic. Understanding the risk class behind a specific coin is the starting point for any serious exposure decision.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin savings in emerging markets: is it safe?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-savings-emerging-markets</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-savings-emerging-markets</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>In countries with high inflation and weak local currencies, dollar-pegged stablecoins have become a practical savings tool for millions of people who cannot easily access US bank accounts. Argentina processed $34 billion in stablecoin transactions in 2024; Nigerian USDC volume exceeded $3 billion per month by 2025. Whether it is safe depends on which stablecoin, which custodian, and which jurisdiction — there is no single answer. The risks are real and specific: custodian failures, depeg events, regulatory crackdowns, and the permanent loss of self-custody keys.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin settlement times by chain: a 2026 comparison</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-settlement-times</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-settlement-times</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Settlement time varies by orders of magnitude across stablecoin chains — from 15 minutes on Ethereum mainnet to under one second on Solana and Tempo. Here is what finality actually means and why it matters for business payments.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin treasury management: a CFO&apos;s guide</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-treasury-management-cfo</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-treasury-management-cfo</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>CFOs are using stablecoins to solve two distinct treasury problems: operational friction in cross-border payments, and idle-balance yield on dollar reserves. This guide covers the risk framework, accounting treatment, and implementation sequence for each.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin trends to watch heading into 2027</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-trends-2027</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-trends-2027</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The stablecoin market enters 2027 with $320B+ in supply, two major regulatory frameworks in force, and B2B payment volume up 733% year-on-year. The next phase is defined by five trends: GENIUS Act implementation reaching its first anniversary, bank-issued tokens moving from institutional-only to consumer rails, machine-to-machine payments maturing, the euro stablecoin gap narrowing, and supply forecasts pointing toward a potential $1 trillion market.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin vs ACH: when does each make sense?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-ach</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-ach</guid>
      <category>Payments</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>ACH is free, ubiquitous, and embedded in every US bank account — but it settles in one to three business days, stops at borders, and goes dark on weekends. Stablecoins settle in under a second around the clock, but require a wallet on both ends. The decision comes down to who you are paying, how fast you need it, and where they are.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin vs CBDC: what&apos;s the difference, and which will win?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-cbdc</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-cbdc</guid>
      <category>Payments</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A stablecoin is a private dollar on a public blockchain; a CBDC is a government-issued digital currency on state-controlled infrastructure. They differ on issuer, programmability, privacy, and who bears the risk — and in 2026 the US and EU have made opposite bets.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin vs cryptocurrency: what&apos;s the difference?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-cryptocurrency</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-cryptocurrency</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ether are designed to be scarce and freely traded, so their prices move. Stablecoins are designed to stay at a fixed price — almost always one US dollar — by holding reserves or using on-chain mechanisms. That single difference determines which is useful as money and which is useful as an investment.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin vs PayPal: what&apos;s the difference?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-paypal</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-paypal</guid>
      <category>Payments</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>PayPal moves money through a closed, centralized ledger that settles with banks in the background. Stablecoins move money on public blockchains that anyone can access and verify. PYUSD is PayPal&apos;s own stablecoin, which means PayPal now does both. The key differences are: stablecoins work between any two wallets on the same chain regardless of account relationship; PayPal requires both parties to have PayPal accounts. Stablecoin transfers are irreversible; PayPal supports chargebacks. Stablecoin fees are near zero on-chain; PayPal fees to merchants are 2.9% + $0.30 for card payments.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin vs wire transfer: cost, speed, and when to use each</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-wire-transfer</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-vs-wire-transfer</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Wire transfers are the backbone of international banking but cost $25–$50 and take 1–5 days. Stablecoin transfers settle in seconds for a fraction of a cent. Here is a corridor-by-corridor breakdown of what each actually costs.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The real risks of earning yield on stablecoins</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-yield-risks</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-yield-risks</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Earning yield on stablecoins is not equivalent to a savings account. The yield comes from somewhere — borrower interest in DeFi, T-bill returns in tokenized funds, or opaque mechanisms in higher-yield products — and each source carries specific risks. Smart-contract exploits drained over $2.47 billion from DeFi in the first half of 2025 alone. The GENIUS Act explicitly excludes yield-bearing tokens from the US payment stablecoin category. This article maps the risks by category so you can match the risk you are taking to the return you are receiving.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Stablecoin yield vs a high-yield savings account: which pays more?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-yield-vs-hysa</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoin-yield-vs-hysa</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>As of June 2026, top high-yield savings accounts pay 3.8–4.1% APY, with outliers reaching 5%. On-chain stablecoin lending on major DeFi protocols pays roughly 3.5–7% APY, with centralized platforms quoting higher figures that carry correspondingly higher risk. The gap is narrower than the headlines suggest — and the risks are fundamentally different.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How stablecoins are disrupting the remittance industry</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoins-disrupting-remittances</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/stablecoins-disrupting-remittances</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The global remittance market moves over $800 billion a year at an average cost of 6.36% — well above the UN&apos;s 3% target. Stablecoin rails are compressing that cost to under 1% in mature corridors, and reshaping who controls the infrastructure.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The state of stablecoins in 2026</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/state-of-stablecoins-2026</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/state-of-stablecoins-2026</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The stablecoin market crossed $320 billion in circulating supply by mid-2026, with B2B payment volume up 733% year-on-year. USDT and USDC account for more than 80% of supply. The GENIUS Act set a US licensing framework; MiCA is fully in force in Europe. Adoption is institutional and accelerating.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SWIFT vs stablecoins: why B2B cross-border payments are changing</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/swift-vs-stablecoins-b2b</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/swift-vs-stablecoins-b2b</guid>
      <category>Cross-border</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>SWIFT moves trillions of dollars a day but takes 1–5 business days and routes through multiple correspondent banks. Stablecoin rails settle the same payment in seconds for a fraction of a cent. Here is what the shift means for businesses.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tempo vs Ethereum for stablecoin payments</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/tempo-vs-ethereum-for-payments</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/tempo-vs-ethereum-for-payments</guid>
      <category>Chains compared</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Ethereum is the most trusted and liquid stablecoin chain in the world. Tempo is a payments-first L1 built to do one thing well. Here is how they compare on fees, finality, gas-token friction, and what each is actually for.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tokenized money market funds: BUIDL, USYC, and what they mean for you</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/tokenized-money-market-funds</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/tokenized-money-market-funds</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Tokenized money market funds put the shares of a regulated, Treasury-backed fund onto a blockchain, so the yield follows the token. BlackRock&apos;s BUIDL, Circle&apos;s USYC, and Franklin Templeton&apos;s BENJI together held roughly $7 billion of the $14.7 billion tokenized-Treasury market as of June 2026 (source: rwa.xyz). They pay yields near the risk-free rate — around 3.4–3.6% APY as of June 2026 — and are legally distinct from payment stablecoins. Access is the binding constraint: most products require institutional onboarding, minimum investments in the millions, or geographic restrictions on US retail investors.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tokenized treasuries compared: BUIDL, USYC, USDY, BENJI</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/tokenized-treasuries-comparison</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/tokenized-treasuries-comparison</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Four products dominate the $14.7 billion tokenized US Treasury market as of June 2026: BlackRock&apos;s BUIDL ($2.39B AUM, 3.40% APY), Circle&apos;s USYC ($2.83B AUM, 3.18% APY), Ondo&apos;s USDY ($2.14B AUM, 3.55% APY), and Franklin Templeton&apos;s BENJI ($836.9M AUM, 3.48% APY) — all sourced from rwa.xyz. They differ on legal structure, minimum investment, chain availability, redemption mechanics, and who can access them. This comparison maps those differences so you can evaluate which product, if any, fits your situation.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is transaction finality, and why does it matter for payments?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/transaction-finality-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/transaction-finality-explained</guid>
      <category>Chains compared</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Finality is the point at which a blockchain transaction cannot be reversed. The difference between probabilistic finality (minutes of risk) and deterministic finality (irreversible in under a second) decides whether a blockchain can work as a real-time settlement system.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The true cost of stablecoin transfers by chain</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/true-cost-stablecoin-transfers-by-chain</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/true-cost-stablecoin-transfers-by-chain</guid>
      <category>Chains compared</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The network fee is only one part of what it costs to move a stablecoin. Add gas-token acquisition, PSP markup, and off-ramp fees and the all-in cost looks very different by chain — especially at $100, $1,000, and $100,000 transfer sizes.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Types of stablecoins: fiat-backed, crypto-backed &amp; algorithmic</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/types-of-stablecoins</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/types-of-stablecoins</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Stablecoins come in three designs — fiat-backed, crypto-backed (over-collateralised), and algorithmic — each with a different peg mechanism, capital model, and failure mode. Fiat-backed coins dominate supply and payments; the algorithmic design has a record of catastrophic failure.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USDC vs USDT vs PYUSD vs RLUSD: a 2026 comparison</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/usdc-usdt-pyusd-rlusd-comparison</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/usdc-usdt-pyusd-rlusd-comparison</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>The four largest regulated dollar stablecoins — USDC, USDT, PYUSD, and RLUSD — differ on market cap, issuer structure, reserve composition, regulatory licensing, and EU availability. All four can move on Tempo.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>USDC vs USDT: which stablecoin should you use?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/usdc-vs-usdt</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/usdc-vs-usdt</guid>
      <category>Stablecoins</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>USDC and USDT are both fiat-backed dollar stablecoins, but they differ on issuer, reserve transparency, regulatory posture, and geographic availability. USDT leads on liquidity and emerging-market reach; USDC leads on compliance, transparency, and EU access. The right choice depends on where and how you move money.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What are agentic payments? How AI agents pay with stablecoins</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/what-are-agentic-payments</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/what-are-agentic-payments</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Agentic payments are autonomous financial transactions made by AI agents — software that acts on a user&apos;s behalf — without human approval at each step. Stablecoins provide the programmable, instant-settling dollar that makes this possible. Two protocols, Coinbase&apos;s x402 and Tempo&apos;s MPP, are defining how it works.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What is Base? Coinbase&apos;s Ethereum L2 for stablecoin payments</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/what-is-base-ethereum-l2</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/what-is-base-ethereum-l2</guid>
      <category>Chains compared</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Base is Coinbase&apos;s Ethereum Layer 2, built on the OP Stack and home to a growing USDC payments ecosystem. Here is how it works, where it fits in the stablecoin landscape, and how it compares to a payments-first L1 like Tempo.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why does gas matter for stablecoin payments?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/why-stablecoin-gas-matters</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/why-stablecoin-gas-matters</guid>
      <category>Chains compared</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Gas is the fee you pay to use a blockchain. On most chains, you pay it in a volatile cryptocurrency you didn&apos;t ask for. That creates real friction for payments — and it&apos;s one of the clearest design problems a payments-first chain can solve.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Why is Tron the biggest chain for USDT?</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/why-tron-biggest-usdt-chain</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/why-tron-biggest-usdt-chain</guid>
      <category>Chains compared</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Tron holds roughly $85–86 billion in USDT as of mid-2026 — more than any other chain — and processed nearly $2 trillion in USDT transfers in Q1 2026. Tron&apos;s dominance comes from a specific sequence: cheap fees when gas is pre-staked, early exchange adoption led by Binance, and the resulting network effect that made Tron USDT the default in emerging markets before better alternatives existed.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What business wire transfers really cost — and the stablecoin alternative</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/wire-transfer-cost-stablecoin-alternative</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/wire-transfer-cost-stablecoin-alternative</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>A business wire transfer carries a fixed fee of $25–$50, an FX markup of 1.5–3%, and a settlement delay of 2–5 days. A stablecoin transfer on a modern payment rail costs under $0.01, settles in seconds, and carries no markup. Here is the math.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>x402 vs MPP: the two protocols defining machine payments</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/x402-vs-mpp-machine-payments</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/x402-vs-mpp-machine-payments</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>x402 (Coinbase) and MPP (Stripe + Tempo) both revive the HTTP 402 status code to let AI agents and software pay for services inline with an HTTP request. They differ in architecture, settlement model, and chain home: x402 settles each request independently on Base or Solana; MPP adds a sessions layer that collapses thousands of micropayments into two on-chain transactions.</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What are yield-bearing stablecoins? USDY, USYC, BUIDL explained</title>
      <link>https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/yield-bearing-stablecoins-explained</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://tempo.dataos.so/articles/yield-bearing-stablecoins-explained</guid>
      <category>Use cases</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Yield-bearing stablecoins are tokens that pass Treasury or money-market returns directly to the holder — unlike USDC or USDT, which keep that yield for the issuer. USDY (Ondo), USYC (Circle/Hashnote), and BUIDL (BlackRock) are the leading examples. The category held roughly $15 billion in assets as of May 2026 and is growing fast, but access restrictions and smart-contract risk mean they are not drop-in replacements for USDC.</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
